Most owners can recite their standards from memory. Far fewer can name the last time they enforced one out loud, in the moment, to the person who broke it. The real employee manual lives somewhere in the gap between those two facts, and your team has been reading it for months.

A standard never dies with an announcement. A coach lets a kid drift out of formation, you see it from the front desk, and you keep typing. Nobody mentions it, including you, and in that moment you and your staff made an agreement.

I teach this as Allow, Permit, Promote. Whatever you allow in your building, you permit to continue. Whatever you permit long enough, you are promoting as the new standard. Your coaches stopped reading the binder a long time ago. They read your face when something goes wrong.

Speed matters more than tone here. A correction that lands the same shift reads as coaching. The same correction a week later reads as a grudge, and two weeks later, dropped into an argument about something else, it reads as spite. I have done all three, and only one of them ever made a coach better.

This goes for parents too. Last week a new dad started coaching his two boys from the sideline during my class. I handed the floor to my assistant, walked over, introduced myself, and told him I loved his passion and needed the kids' focus on the coaches while they are on the mat, so keep coaching them up before and after class. Ninety seconds. If I had waited until after class, he would have been out the door in the rush, and the next coach would have inherited him.

Run the math on the conversations you dodge. At $200 a month and a twelve month average stay, every family is worth $2,400. The ten minute conversation you skip with a parent or a coach is priced at whatever it costs you in families. No owner would write a $2,400 check to avoid ten awkward minutes, and plenty of them write it every week with their silence.

Before I enforce anything, I hold up a mirror. On site visits I usually meet with the owner first and hear the complaints about the staff. Then I sit with the staff one on one, and they hand me the same list about the owner, almost word for word.

Whatever you model, your staff runs at about eighty percent of it. Bring a five on energy and you get a four. Bring a three and you get a two, and then you complain about the two. The owner who wonders why his coaches never train on their own is usually the owner who trained with them for one week and quietly stopped showing up.

Same rules as everyone else. At MUV, if I run a meeting without a written agenda, nobody has to stay, and that includes my managers walking out on me. I wear the staff shirt in the building on nights I am not even teaching, because I would send any coach home for showing up in a random tee. I also teach every class on Mondays and talk to my head coach through all of them. Why this drill is set up this way, what mistake he sees, what to watch for the rest of the week. The standard gets demonstrated live on the first day of the week, before anyone has a chance to drift from it.

The most dangerous person on your team is popular with the staff and ignores your standards. Usually that person is a head coach, and usually the owner tolerates it out of fear, because if that coach walks, the owner goes back to teaching six classes a night.

Everyone else on the team wants that role someday. So they watch what the person holding it gets away with, and they copy it. A few months later you have a staff that skips class plans and shrugs at policy, and every one of them learned it from the person you protected.

A few years ago, at a school I was running, we had an $84,000 month. It was May, nowhere near a holiday sale. Our head coach had been talked to about the standards more times than I can count. We let him go right after the best month that school had ever had. That month's revenue told me nothing about what the team would look like a year later if he stayed.

Owners love to skip straight to the write up. Before any of that, I run three questions.

Did they know it was the standard? If it is not written down, it is an idea you mentioned once in passing. Every husband already knows how well "I told you" holds up. With AI there is zero excuse left here. Talk for three minutes, let it organize the standard, print it, post it.

Can they do it? I once met a manager closing enrollments at fifty percent who kept hearing from her owner that she needed to do better. Her last sales training was the week she was hired, two and a half years earlier. Picture demanding a perfect side kick from a student who has not thrown one with you in thirty months. A skill gap gets trained and role played, with you going first.

Do they have the capacity? It is rarely time. A head coach once told me he had no time for missing student calls. He was in the building from 12:30 until classes started at 4:30. One afternoon I pulled up the camera and watched forty five minutes of him on his phone with his foot on the desk.

Only when someone knows the standard, can do it, has room for it, and still won't, does it become an accountability problem.

Our accountability ladder has four rungs. A verbal warning is a sit down conversation, clear and direct, and a comment tossed between classes does not count. We record every disciplinary conversation and tell the person we are recording. Years ago a former employee told the state we had no process. We sent the recording and the signed write up, and we never heard about it again.

The second rung is a written warning with a plan, usually ninety days, that spells out exactly how I will coach them up in that window. Managers who miss their goals ninety days straight are no longer managers, and they know that going in. Third is an unpaid suspension, which I like for key players. Two weeks away tells you fast whether the school catches fire without them. Most of the time a couple of students ask where they went, and that is the whole impact.

Fourth is termination, which we treat as a respectful conclusion. If the earlier rungs were done right, the person already knows why. We hand over the final check, wish them well, and skip the debate. Some things jump straight to the top rung, like theft or anything inappropriate with a student, parent or staff member. Those live on a game over list in our employee manual so nobody can claim they never saw it.

I run my staff like a pro team. You keep the loyalty and the we over me, and you still earn the role every single day. Picture the Patriots sending Drew Bledsoe back out because he had been there longer, with Tom Brady sitting on the bench.

Declan came to us as a brown belt and finished our coaching certification in under a month, when we give people ninety days. For six to eight months as an assistant he did his outreach, asked for more responsibility, and outworked everyone in staff training. Our head coach at the time had high attrition and needed reminders for every off the mat task, and he had trained under me for twenty five years. We demoted him and promoted Declan, and Declan has thrived in the role ever since.

Your A players notice everything. They fix what the C players break, carry the extra load, and sit through training pitched at the weakest person in the room. Every week you keep someone below the standard, your best coach is doing two jobs and watching to see if you will ever do yours. Eventually they leave for a building that holds the line.

Your culture tops out at the weakest coach you are still willing to put on the schedule.

Most owners read an issue like this one, agree with every word, and change nothing, because nobody is in the room asking what they plan to enforce on Monday. Impakt Tour Miami is that room.

February 19 to 20, 2027, in Miami, Florida. Two days of hot-seat coaching, enrollment and retention workshops, and leadership and staff development sessions with the four Impakt coaches, plus an after-hours team social. Your ticket includes admission, materials, meals during sessions and the post-event playbook.

It is limited to fifty seats, and it is built for owners who would rather fix their standard in a room full of operators than read about it alone.

Claim Your Seat →

Most corrections go sideways before anyone sits down, because the owner walks in frustrated with a vague complaint and no written standard to point at. This prompt makes you diagnose the gap first, then hands you the written standard, your opening lines, the right rung of the ladder and a written plan. You walk into the room with paperwork instead of a mood.

Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT and answer each question as it comes.

COPY EVERYTHING IN THIS BOX

"You are an operations coach for a martial arts school owner. I need to address a staff member who is falling below a standard. Ask me the following questions one at a time, and wait for my answer before asking the next one.

1. What is the staff member's role, and how long have they been with the school?

2. What standard are they missing? Describe exactly what you have seen, with dates and specifics.

3. Is this standard written down somewhere they can access it? If yes, paste it.

4. When were they last trained or role played on this specific skill?

5. Walk me through their typical shift. When should this task happen, and what else competes for that time?

6. Have you already talked to them about it? If so, when, how, and was it documented?

7. Is there anywhere you, as the owner, have not been modeling this standard yourself?

Once you have all seven answers, give me:

A. A diagnosis: is this a did not know, a cannot do, a no capacity, or a will not issue? Explain your reasoning in two or three sentences.

B. If the standard is not written, write it for me in three to five plain sentences that are specific and measurable.

C. If it is a skill gap, a 15 minute role play drill I can run with them this week, with me going first.

D. If it is a capacity issue, a revised shift block showing exactly when this task gets done.

E. If it is a will not, tell me which step of a four step accountability ladder applies (verbal warning, written warning with a plan, suspension, termination), and write the first three sentences of that conversation. Start by owning any part I played.

F. A 30, 60 or 90 day written plan with a weekly check in and a clear definition of what success looks like.

G. A short documentation note I can file after the conversation.

Keep the language direct and calm, with no HR jargon, and format it so I can print it."

Run it the same day you see the slip, while the details are fresh, because a correction that waits a week turns into a grudge. Print the plan, both of you sign it, and put the weekly check ins on your calendar before you leave the room. If the diagnosis comes back as did not know three times in a row, go rewrite your manual.

Adam Kifer on matching the correction to the problem. When the whole room's standard drops, correct the room. When it is one athlete, send an assistant to that athlete and keep the class moving, because downtime costs you focus and sweat. It is the on the mat version of this week's issue, and a quick way to find out whether your assistants have been trained to take the handoff.

Watch the reel →

Jason Goggans (@black.wolf.leadership) says strong leaders freely admit their mistakes and own the responsibility of fixing them, and anything short of that is weak leadership. Most standard resets in this industry open with a list of everything the staff did wrong. Read this before your next team meeting and open with your own line item instead.

Read the full post →

@jasonasousa says to watch any team in the five seconds after someone misses, because that is where you learn whether it is safe to play free there. Swap athletes for coaches and run the same test on your floor tonight. If your assistants freeze after a miss, they have learned to expect a gotcha, and that usually traces back to how corrections get handed out.

Read the full post →

Adam Kifer on getting kids moving first and talking second when they are stuck emotionally, and why "go to your room" usually backfires at home. The fix is to step outside together, walk quietly for thirty seconds, then start asking questions. Steal it and teach it to your own parents, in a lobby talk, a parent email or a thirty second huddle after class. The school that helps a mom get through Tuesday night's meltdown is the school that family stays with.

Watch the reel →

Spotted something worth featuring? Send it to [email protected]

In a Leadership IQ survey of 70,305 employees, managers and executives across 116 organizations, 87 percent said working alongside a low performer had made them consider changing jobs.

Considering is different from leaving, and this is a training company's self-reported survey, so read it as sentiment and not a turnover rate. The useful part is who answers yes. People who never notice a low performer have nothing to report. The ones who notice are the coaches covering the extra classes and fixing the sloppy setups, and 93 percent of respondents in the same survey said working with a low performer cut their own productivity.

The second number comes from a lab. Will Felps ran an experiment in which small teams worked on a task with one planted actor playing a slacker, a jerk or a pessimist. Teams carrying that one person performed 30 to 40 percent worse than teams without. The actor was a stranger with no title and no tenure, and he still dragged the whole group down. In a martial arts school, the low performer is often the one with the head coach title and the longest history with the owner, which makes the drag harder to see and much harder to name.

Pull up next week's staff schedule. Find the name you have been avoiding a conversation with, then look at who is scheduled on the floor next to them Thursday at 5:15. That coach has already done this math, and they did it without you.

Sources: Leadership IQ low performer study, via ProjectManagement.com; Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., & Byington, E. (2006). How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27; experiment figures as reported by Felps on This American Life, episode 370, "Ruining It for the Rest of Us."

Somewhere in your building is a coach who has not heard from you in a while. No correction, no compliment, nothing about their classes at all. You might call that trust. From their side it looks like you stopped watching, and people who believe nobody is watching start teaching for themselves. Every pro athlete knows the coach who stops correcting him is usually getting ready to trade him. Your coach knows it too, and has probably already decided what your silence means.