The Kick | Issue 64

What Most Schools Call Correction Is Actually Something Else
Walk into almost any martial arts school and watch the assistants for five minutes.
Not the head instructor. The assistants.
You'll see them scattered on the mat, arms crossed, watching. Maybe one of them gives a kid a high five after a round kick that had no pivot, no hip turn, and the wrong foot planted. The kid grins. The parent in the bleachers nods. The coach moves on.
This is what most schools call correction. It is not correction. It is observation with praise attached.
Correction is intentional change making. That phrase matters. Because pointing at a kid from six feet away and saying "switch legs" mid-count and then continuing to walk is not a correction. It is a comment. A comment delivered without verification that anything changed.
The difference between those two things is the difference between a school that retains students and a school that loses them to soccer.
Why Parents Really Leave
Parents do not say "I'm leaving because your coaches walk past problems without fixing them." They say "my kid just isn't into it anymore." They say "we have too much going on." They say whatever is easiest to put on a cancellation form.
But the actual reason is almost always this: they stopped seeing visible progress.
Not the absence of progress. The absence of visible progress. Your coaches can see it. You can see it. The parent watching from a chair near the door cannot see it unless someone communicates it.
And here is the uncomfortable version of this: if you cannot articulate what a student's win was at the end of class, you did not create one. You were there, the kid was there, time passed. That is not the same as progress being made visible.
A parent who watched her kid struggle with the same thing for four months, with no instructor ever pulling her aside to say "here's what we're working on with Johnny and here's what we're seeing improve," is going to believe the program is not working. Even if it is.
The SEE Framework
The order in which you correct matters more than most instructors realize.
There is a sequence. Safety first. Efficiency second. Excellence third.
Safety means: fix anything that could cause injury before you touch anything else. If the wrist is bent on the punch, you do not coach more power. If the stance is off-balance, you do not coach speed. New instructors need this sequence hammered in because the instinct is to fix what looks bad, not what could hurt someone.
Efficiency is context-dependent. What makes a round kick efficient during a pad drill focused on power is not what makes it efficient during a form. The correction changes based on what the drill is actually for. This is where most coaching breaks down — instructors apply a generic correction to a specific context and wonder why the athlete doesn't improve.
Excellence is the 1% detail that separates adequate technique from something that actually works under pressure. Tournament precision. Snap speed. The hip rotation that makes the kick land differently. This is the last layer, not the first. Coaches who skip to excellence because they love the craft create students who look good but fall apart when someone's actually coming at them.
Give new instructors one instruction: correct for safety only. That is their entire job at first. When they're ready, add efficiency. When they're ready for that, add excellence. This is how you build a coaching staff instead of a collection of people who happen to know martial arts.
The 3-Rep Rule
A correction is not complete until the athlete can execute it correctly and independently three times in a row. That is the only definition that counts.
Walking by, pointing at a kid, saying "chamber higher," and continuing on — that is not a correction. That is information delivered with no follow-up. If the same error shows up in next week's class, the correction never happened. Something was said. Nothing changed.
The 3-rep rule closes that loop. Sit with the athlete. Watch them execute. If they get two right and the third breaks down, start over. Three clean reps in a row, without you coaching each one, is the benchmark.
One more thing: one correction per athlete, per interaction. Not two. Not a running list of everything you noticed. The kid who just got told to fix their footwork, their chamber, and their kiai timing simultaneously heard nothing. Give them one thing. Make sure it lands. Then move on.
Connection Before Correction
Here is something that gets skipped in every instructor training you have ever seen written down.
A kid who is giving low effort on the mat is almost never having a martial arts problem. They had a bad day at school. Their parents argued on the way over. Something is off and it has nothing to do with the round kick.
The instinct is to push. Clap by their ear. Tell them to go harder. That is the wrong move. It does not fix the effort problem. It just adds pressure to whatever was already there.
The right move is to stop and ask. "You doing okay today? I can see something's off — what's going on?" Let them talk. Reaffirm what you know about them. Tell them what you've seen from them when they're at their best. Then get them back on the mat.
That interaction takes ninety seconds. It changes the rest of the class for that kid. And that kid's parent, who watched it happen from the bleachers, just saw something they will tell people about.
This is what it means to know your students. Not their belt rank. Not how their kick looked last Thursday. Know five things about every kid in your school that have nothing to do with martial arts. Their favorite sport. What they want to be when they grow up. What they're into outside the dojo.
DO THIS: Pull up your cancellation list from the last ninety days. Ask your coaches to name five non-martial-arts facts about each kid on that list. See how many they can do.
That exercise will tell you more about your retention problem than any metric.
A great martial arts instructor is not defined by their rank, their record, or their energy. A great martial arts instructor is defined by whether everyone they work with gets visibly better.
JUNE 16TH - WE ARE TELLING YOU WHERE YOUR WEBSITE COMPANY IS DROPPING THE BALL…
Your website looks like the school down the street. And the one two towns over. And the one that opened six months ago.
You were told it was custom. It wasn't. You're paying a monthly fee and you're not entirely sure what for. Your leads have dropped off and you have no real idea whether your site is showing up in search, let alone in AI search. And if you've ever looked at your conversion rate, it's probably under 10%.
These are not unique problems. They are industry-wide problems created by the same handful of companies selling the same template to every school owner who will buy it.
On June 16 at 10am Pacific, we're running a free broadcast on what your website should actually be doing in 2026. What's missing. What it's costing you. And what the schools gaining ground right now are doing differently. No website service pitch. Just the framework we built at MUV and have been deploying for Mastermind members with rapid success.
If any of those questions above describe your situation, this broadcast is for you. Register through the link below.

WORTH STEALING - The Staff Training Session Prompt
Most coaches walk into staff training with good intentions and no system. They talk. Their team listens. Nothing changes by the following Friday.
The problem is not the content. The problem is that the training never becomes a practice. Here is a prompt you can paste into Claude or ChatGPT right now that will turn any coaching concept into a repeatable staff training session your team can actually execute, not just hear about.
You are helping me build a staff training session for martial arts instructors. I am going to give you a coaching concept or skill I want my team to improve on. Your job is to help me build a 20-minute training session that follows this structure: a 5-minute teach (the core idea explained simply), a 5-minute demonstration (what it looks like done right vs. wrong), and a 10-minute role play (how two instructors practice it with each other). For the role play, give me a specific scenario, the roles each person plays, and 2-3 coaching cues I should give them while they practice. Ask me for the concept I want to train before you start.
Run this before your next staff meeting. Let the AI build the session outline. You adjust for your school's language and style. Then run the session, not the lecture. Your team retains about ten percent of what they hear and closer to seventy percent of what they practice. The prompt changes which one you're doing.

SEEN IN THE WILD
Your staff retention rate is a coaching quality report
Leila Hormozi wrote that people don't stay because of perks — they stay because they feel seen. She's talking about employees. The same sentence applies to every student in your school, word for word. When you only speak up when something is wrong, you train people to disengage. The correction-without-connection approach is the same pattern whether it's an employee or a ten-year-old in a gi.
The owner who builds the asset vs. the owner who is the asset
Chad Willardson on the Case Studies Podcast makes the distinction between owning a business and building a responsibility you cannot escape. The school owner who cannot take a week off without the whole thing wobbling is not running a school — they are the school. The correction work we talked about in this issue is, at its core, about transferring the standard to your team so the school runs whether you are on the mat or not.
The reason your feedback lands differently depending on who delivers it
Simon Sinek posted a clip making the point that we do business with people, not companies. The more useful framing for school owners: your students do martial arts with people, not programs. The instructor who has five non-martial-arts facts memorized about every kid on their mat is not just being friendly. They are building the exact relationship that makes a correction land instead of bounce.
Your entire operating strategy in 30 seconds
Alex Hormozi compressed 13 years of business thinking into a short reel. The throughline: most owners confuse activity for progress. The specific application for school owners is harder than the general advice — you are simultaneously the product, the coach, the culture, and the CEO. The reel won't fix that. But it'll sharpen the lens you're using to look at it.
The Impakt Tour is coming to Chicago on August 14 and 15.
This is not a conference. There are no keynote speakers talking at you from a stage while you take notes you will never look at again. This is a working room. You leave with things built, implemented, and ready to run. Not a list of homework. Not a binder full of frameworks. Actual completed work.
The room is a mix of school owners doing $30,000 to $200,000 a month. People who are past the survival stage and building toward something bigger. Adam Kifer, Jadi Tention, Kelly Murray, and Donovan Rider will be in the room with you. So will Nicole Stratachuk.
Two days of working sessions covering marketing your training and personal development, staff development, building your instructor team, and scaling to new revenue thresholds. The kind of things that feel urgent every week but never get the focused time they need.
If you have been on a Kick Broadcast call and thought you needed more time with these people in a room, this is that.
BONUS FOR KICK SUBSCRIBERS: SAVE $1000 WITH CODE IMPAKT1000

THE STAT
According to research by University of Kansas communication professor Jeffrey Hall, it takes between 40 and 60 hours of shared time to form a casual friendship, and 80 to 100 hours before someone considers you a genuine friend. His study tracked 355 adults who had recently relocated and were building new relationships from scratch. University of Kansas
Here is the part that matters for school owners: Hall found that people who spent in excess of 400 to 600 hours together at work still only called each other acquaintances. Time alone is not enough. Proximity alone is not enough. What builds the relationship is intentional connection. A kid who has attended your school for two years but whose coach cannot name five things about them outside of martial arts has been present for hundreds of hours and is still, functionally, a stranger. That is not a retention problem. That is a connection deficit that eventually shows up as a cancellation. MindBodyGreen

CLOSING THOUGHT
The standard you are willing to walk past is the standard you are willing to accept. On the mat, that means the kid with the bent wrist who gets a high five anyway just learned that bent wrists are fine. The assistant who stands at the edge of class watching instead of correcting just taught every parent in those bleachers what level of attention their child is worth. You did not choose neutrality. You chose a lower standard and called it nothing.
But this principle does not stop at the mat's edge. It lives in every part of how you run your school. The instructor who shows up unprepared and gets through it. The cancellation form that goes unanswered for three days. The student you noticed pulling back two months ago and decided to wait and see about. Every one of those moments was a choice dressed up as an oversight. The schools that are growing right now are not doing dramatically different things. They are just refusing to walk past the small stuff. That refusal, compounded over time, is the only gap that actually matters.



